the court does not provide or be prepared to provide evidence.&quot

people.com.cn Beijing on 20 Cheap Armani Sunglasses August, Cheap Cartier Original Sunglasses (Li Nannan) according to the Beijing Haidian District people's court official micro-blog news, today at nine thirty in the morning, the Peking University and the Beijing dream Taoyuan restaurant Co. v. accused Zou Hengfu of two case will be announced publicly in Haidian court. In this case, Beijing Cheng Hui law firm lawyers Xu Rong said in an interview with reporters people.com.cn released, if the accused Zou Hengfu of content, is only produced a kind of entertainment, or just make the North has become a recent public a topic, and not to damage the reputation of the University, then the behavior of Zou Hengfu still can not constitute the infringement of the reputation right behavior.

Zou Hengfu called " the dirty old man too much " sued

;

in August 21, 2012, Zou Hengfu published content in its Sina micro-blog: "Peking University Dean eat in the dream Taoyuan North treatment room as long as see the beautiful waitress will start their adultery. Peking University Professor Dean is no exception. So, dream of Taoyuan business. In addition to Zou Hengfu, the dirty old man too much."

said "Peking University Dean eat in the dream Taoyuan North treatment room as long as see the beautiful waitress will start their adultery. Peking University Professor Dean is no Cheap D&G Sunglasses exception. So, dream of Taoyuan business......." "The waiter competent women also like to Peking University Dean Professor chief minister toasting ah ha ha. Invoice to the number of how many to buy much". "The Cheap Burberry Sunglasses Dean Professor and director general in content through dream Taoyuan Zhili catering bream eat and drink with the beautiful waitress development lustful relationship", caused widespread concern. Since then the Peking University and the dream of Taoyuan catering company to the infringement of right of reputation for will Zou Hengfu to court. For the content of hair, the defendant Zou Hengfu said in January 20th: "the court does not provide or be prepared to provide evidence."

Law: as of PKU honorary caused no damage does not constitute infringement of

"in this case, north is the proper plaintiff?" Beijing Sunway lawyer Xu Rong told people.com.cn Cheap EDhardy Sunglasses reporter the interview said, first of all, according to China's "general principles of civil law" and the Supreme People's court "on the implementation of the general principles of the civil law provisions of < > the views of a number of issues", legal person shall enjoy the right of reputation, the laws and regulations of our country can be divided into enterprise legal person legal persons, organizations, institutions, social organizations and affiliated corporation, Peking University is a public institution legal person, it shall enjoy the right of reputation. If the north that any citizen, legal person or other organization infringement on the right of reputation, and give the corresponding damage, then north of course can be used as the plaintiff to prosecute.

secondly, specific to the case, Zou Hengfu does not identify specific individuals in the micro-blog, and his comments are almost at the north the legal subject and its components, then, Peking University should have the right to prosecute Zou Hengfu infringement on the right of reputation. As to the lawsuit win or lose, that is to say Zou Hengfu's infringement is established, it is the court's content, will eventually by the court judgment.

>